Russell:

Sure, I'm happy to hand it over to you, Russell, if you wish.

First, I need to explain my rationale as to why I inserted paragraphs 5 & 6, and maybe some other folks might want to comment as well, based on their experience.

Paragraph 5 Rationale:
In a court of law, a binding agreement should have a specified term that is expressed in writing. I don't have a Rife machine, so I don't have any experience loaning out a device. While I believe a 2 week term might be excessive, in contracts that involve no remuneration, the party involved in loaning out their equipment without cost has the right to take it back prior to the end of the period, and should stipulate a circumstance(s) wherein (s)he might require the equipment to be returned. Further, this paragraph lends further credibility to the fact that this is a contract without compensation.

Paragraph 6 Rationale:
Paragraph 6 is the crux of a "no compensation" type of contract agreement. Since there is no remuneration, it is clear to a court that the Rife device owner is performing an act of kindness, based on mutual signatures. Without this paragraph, the owner of the Rife device is not on solid ground, and a plaintiff's attorney could claim there was some implied benefit to the Rife device owner.
<img id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">