I have not read on the Rife forum in a couple of weeks, but received nontification about the recent post regarding Equipment. I also just this past week read what is loosly called the Copmparet papers or files..here is the link to 49 pages of very interesting information abot freqs. and power and other intersting things Bertrand L Comparet was Dr Rife's attorney, and has very intersting information in his article.
http://www.rife.org/john%20marsh/rifeinstrumenthistory.pdf

What is interesting and what I am Now asking.. I am beginning to understand carrier freq..as pointed out in the Comparet article. I am curios about several machines I am considering getting, as to how Srtong an output power the machines put out. One is the Plasma Plus, One made by Bruce Stenulson the SYSTEM 8CE EM+ and the 3rd is the
GB-04000. I love the looks and compactness of the GB- 4000 and the price is also nice. The other two units use both plasma tubes with rays a well, as I understand it, you can use contact plates as well. There may be others but nothing has sparked my interest like these 3 machines. The GB has a great way to read freq, the other 2 units seem to have a thrown together way of reading Frq, but I do like other features of the other units.

I have not read enough, or have understood RIFE long enough...only 3 or 4 weeks now... to grasp all that either unit will or will not do. But I do want a strong machine with high output. Using plasma tubes sounds like it "covers more teritory" where as the pads or plates seem less coverage or possibly peneration. I am not particularily worried about being discovered wtih broadcasting waves into the air as did occure in the Comparet article above.
I have been told by one user of the 8CE EM+ machine that is is stong but the foot print is not that large, and fades after about 12 feet, but is very stong inside of that range. I do not know if the 8CE or the Plasma Plus use carrier waves..as I definitely feel this is something very valid that you need. I am a Physical Therapis, wanting to learn more and have volunteer research subjects , but have no plans to use any unit in my practic or with any of my patients.
Any one wanting to comment or clarify my head or my questons would be greatly appreciatd. Also has anyone or many of you heard of the DNA frequencies being used and developed by Charlen Boehm.

Thanks to all involved with this facinating information
Coastalguy