How Are Rife Manufacturers Compared?

[Richard Di Nucci]

I am a newcomer to the Rife Forum, and will be purchasing a Rife System within the next few months.

The title of this thread is "How are Rife Manufacturers Compared?" Hoping to see an objective, quantitative assessment of factual info, I was surprised, instead, to see:

1. A Paradox: Over the past 5 years, there have been a number of new or upgraded Rife machines, while simultaneously, there has been a surge in genuine interest from all corners of the world in "everything Rife" . . . yet paradoxically, this thread has been dead since 2008.

2. A Wiki Rife Machine Table, But . . . :
Back in 2009/2010, there was a great attempt by the Wiki folks to create a much needed comparative analysis of different Rife Machines where newcomers like me are able to compare different machine features.

And yet here's another paradox! This Wiki table has not been updated in four years (last update was in Feb 2010).
Link:
http://www.rifewiki.org/wiki/R.I.F.E_Machine_Table

This Forum Deserves A Comparative Table of Rife Machines:
I'm sure that there are many other "potential Rifers" who frequent this site and who, like me, would like to obtain factual info on the various features of Rife Machines. I don't mean to sound ungrateful or offensive to anyone who has donated their time/ energy to provide helpful info within this thread; on the contrary, I appreciate the advice.

However, I have observed that there are representatives of some Rife Machine manufacturers who have used this thread as their own marketing tool, instead of listing factual and truthful info about their product. In my opinion, the content within threads of this RifeForum.com is no place for marketing hype or marketing ads.

So How Do We Get There from Here? A Small Committee, Perhaps?
A fair and objective way to build a factual Table of Rife Machine features would be for a few of us to volunteer to build such a table, then double check the facts before posting it (maybe ask a few Rife "luminaries" for their endorsement of factual data???) There's got to be a few simple groundrules; I can start the process by listing the most important groundrule at the top
( . . . this does not allow the fox to get inside the chicken coop!)
1. No representatives or employees of Rife Machine Manufacturers
2. The final product must be understandable by the average member (i.e. factual info that does not contain "technical priesthood" terminology to confuse or impress the non technical person)
3.
4.
( feel free to add whatever groundrules you believe would be appropriate!)

As a retired electronics engineer, I'm willing to volunteer some of my time to accomplish this, if the forum believes it can be worthwhile. Comments, suggestions, or criticisms are welcome.


P.S. One such criticism, for example, could be that the politics of creating such a table might not be worth it. Alternatively, the majority on this Forum may agree with my boldfaced statement above that this elite RifeForum deserves a factual table of Rife machines.




<img style="width: 16px; height: 16px; border: 0px none;" id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">

[CharBoehm]

Well, this is a refreshing change, Richard. Thanks for posting about it.

Yes, the Rife Machine Table desperately needs updated. I printed out the left half of it shortly after it came out, added some of my own notes, and then gradually added more information about devices as time wore on.

One thing that would really help the table itself, is to make every other horizontal row in color (not white). It's really difficult to accurately follow the material across the whole width of the chart. And maybe a vertical column could be added in the middle of chart that mirrors the left-hand column.

Char

[Richard Di Nucci]

Char:

Thanks for your suggestions (As a side note, I've done quite a bit of reading here on the RifeForum over the past 6 weeks, and every time I see your name on a thread, I have always found very useful and practical information!!!). So needless to say, I was pleased to see your addition on this thread.

Yes, we desperately need an updated Rife Machine Table, and I agree with your suggestions to make it a lot more easily readable. I had glanced at that Wiki table a few weeks ago, and asked myself if non-technical people would be better served by modifying the Wiki table to conform, to a greater degree, with many of the categories that Peter Walker had identified in the beginning of this thread (wow! that was waay back in 2002!). I also resonate (no pun intended!) with much of the process that Peter had identified back then.

But this undertaking, while a challenge, must be done; it could be made easier to do if we can somehow minimize the politics and unsubstantiated info from folks who represent some of the manufacturers. I'm just a newcomer to this Forum, but I'll do what I can to contribute.

To All: Please feel free to provide your thoughts, as well as constructive criticisms with the current Wiki format that I've referenced above.

R
<img id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">

[Peter Walker]

I am planning to take up that project again soon, probably in March. Just a matter of finding the time to do it.

There are a number of articles I am planning to release on the wiki including device related ones.

[Richard Di Nucci]

Peter:

Members of this Forum are grateful for your continued hard work and dedication.

With all that you do, it's a wonder that you find time for stuff like this. Please reach out to us if we can be of help, even in doing some mundane tasks. I'll be happy to help out in whatever way I can.

R
<img id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">

[Mike J Bell]

Its nice to see some life on this forum I was about to give up due to the older posts. I have only owned an Ultimate B3 Frequency Generator it is a 2.4 MHZ Sweep Function Generator. It is currently over 10 yrs old, I do not know how it stacks up to all the latest machines on the market. In fact I am lost as to what I could upgrade to that compares. Also is there anything out there that would fight infections etc thats affordable for someone on a tight budget? Thanks for any help.

[Jenny Lin]

Q1) Besides Perl from ResonantLight & RobinF125 & other Robin models, can GB4000 and Doug Coil run frequencies with more than 1 decimal point, such as 705.86, 56.56, etc.?

Q2) Also, what are the frequency range limitations of all these machine? What are the highest and lowest frequecy they can run?
(A) Perl;
(B) RobinF125;
(C) GB4000 with or without plasma light;
(D) Doug Coil

Q3) I also heard that if a machine can't run a certain frequency, we can divide or multiple it by 2 until it reaches a frequency number one's machine can run. For example, if a machine can't run freq. 5.5, we can multiple it by 2, then by 2 by 2 to reach freq. 44 so that that particular rife machine which can only run freq. over 40 can run it. Has anyone had any postive and/or negative experience on this? Please share and/or give your 2 cents. Thanks.

Jen