Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: How Are Rife Manufacturers Compared?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Banned Chat with me Jason Ringas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 64 Times in 52 Posts

    Default Re: How Are Rife Manufacturers Compared?

    In reference to the debate on plasma tube versus pad type applications, I've never seen any definite information on the subject. We just don't know at this juncture if the plasma tube adds something "extra", making it a necessity. If anyone makes a claim or implication that their machine is "better", because it uses a plasma tube, they should back it up with some solid evidence. By the same token, if someone claims that the plasma tube is not necessary, then that should be backed up too.

    This comes back to the fundamental issues of what is Rife research, Rife technology, and Rife therapy? Despite all that we've learned over the years, there are still many people who blatantly misrepresent the matter. As I've said so many times before, "Rife" is not about any particular hardware, it's about a methodology. It doesn't matter if you use pads, plasma tubes, vacuum tubes, transistors, analog, digital, or whatever else. If you can produce the "Rife effect", and can demonstrate it with the same methodology that Rife used, that's all that matters. In "Rife therapy", you shouldn't really be talking about what disease you're treating, but rather what microorganism you're trying to devitalize. In Rife's hand-written lab notes, they didn't "ray" the experimental animals for cancer, they "rayed" them for the BX organism. The fact that Rife believed the BX organism was the cause of the cancer is beside the point. "Rife therapy" is founded upon rigorous laboratory research and testing, not clinical trials or results. Clinical results may be the ultimate goal, but if your "therapy" is not founded upon, or is somehow divorced from in vitro laboratory research, it's not "Rife therapy" and it's not "Rife research". Anyone claiming otherwise is misrepresenting the matter, and is "muddying the water". They are not only doing a disservice to Rife's name and legacy, but are doing a disservice to the broader field of electrotherapy. This misrepresentation and in some cases outright fraud needs to stop.

    Regards,


    Jason

    P.S. Who disagrees with what I've said here, and why? What I've said here is the crux of what Rife is all about, so I would like to hear what any objections may be and why.
    Last edited by Jason Ringas; 07-19-2008 at 01:51.

  2. Thanks Jason Ringas:

    Richard Di Nucci (12-23-2013)

Similar Threads

  1. The Rife Forum Newsletter - July 2013!
    By Peter Walker in forum Rife Forum Newsletters
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 23:17
  2. The Rife Forum Newsletter - March 2010!
    By Peter Walker in forum Rife Forum Newsletters
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 14:27
  3. The Rife Forum Newsletter - September 2009!
    By Peter Walker in forum Rife Forum Newsletters
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 03:52
  4. The Rife Forum Newsletter - June 2009!
    By Peter Walker in forum Rife Forum Newsletters
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 20:41

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •