How Are Rife Manufacturers Compared?

[Mike Kirkpatrick]

I just found this discussion, and now have a few questions for Mr. Garff:

I notice that the GB-4000 is now being offered with an Emem-type plasma device.

1. Can you run the carrier from the GB-4000 through the Emem?
2. What is the highest frequency from the GB-4000 that can be run through the Emem?
3. Is the Emem-SRX 10Khz (as stated on one page of your website) or 10,000,000 Hz as stated on another page?
4. Can the amp be used with the Emem?

Thank you,

Mike

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Mike,

I hope these answers will be helpful.

>I just found this discussion, and now have a few questions for Mr. Garff:
I notice that the GB-4000 is now being offered with an Emem-type plasma device.

This site is one of our distributors site. We do not built the Emem-SRX.

>1. Can you run the carrier from the GB-4000 through the Emem?

No. If you use the carrier frequency it will damage it.

>2. What is the highest frequency from the GB-4000 that can be run through the Emem?

I believe that you can run up to 10,000 hertz through it.

>3. Is the Emem-SRX 10Khz (as stated on one page of your website) or 10,000,000 Hz as stated on another page?

The Emem-SRX can output up to 10,000,000 Hz if you use it as a stand alone instrument. But you need to understand that it only outputs 1/10 of one watt (0.10). This is all the FCC will allow. So the power is very limited. Dr. Rife’s 1934 instrument was 500 times more powerful.

>4. Can the amp be used with the Emem?

No. It will damage it.

Best wishes
Jeff Garff

[Stephen Freeman]

I have not read on the Rife forum in a couple of weeks, but received nontification about the recent post regarding Equipment. I also just this past week read what is loosly called the Copmparet papers or files..here is the link to 49 pages of very interesting information abot freqs. and power and other intersting things Bertrand L Comparet was Dr Rife's attorney, and has very intersting information in his article.
http://www.rife.org/john%20marsh/rifeinstrumenthistory.pdf

What is interesting and what I am Now asking.. I am beginning to understand carrier freq..as pointed out in the Comparet article. I am curios about several machines I am considering getting, as to how Srtong an output power the machines put out. One is the Plasma Plus, One made by Bruce Stenulson the SYSTEM 8CE EM+ and the 3rd is the
GB-04000. I love the looks and compactness of the GB- 4000 and the price is also nice. The other two units use both plasma tubes with rays a well, as I understand it, you can use contact plates as well. There may be others but nothing has sparked my interest like these 3 machines. The GB has a great way to read freq, the other 2 units seem to have a thrown together way of reading Frq, but I do like other features of the other units.

I have not read enough, or have understood RIFE long enough...only 3 or 4 weeks now... to grasp all that either unit will or will not do. But I do want a strong machine with high output. Using plasma tubes sounds like it "covers more teritory" where as the pads or plates seem less coverage or possibly peneration. I am not particularily worried about being discovered wtih broadcasting waves into the air as did occure in the Comparet article above.
I have been told by one user of the 8CE EM+ machine that is is stong but the foot print is not that large, and fades after about 12 feet, but is very stong inside of that range. I do not know if the 8CE or the Plasma Plus use carrier waves..as I definitely feel this is something very valid that you need. I am a Physical Therapis, wanting to learn more and have volunteer research subjects , but have no plans to use any unit in my practic or with any of my patients.
Any one wanting to comment or clarify my head or my questons would be greatly appreciatd. Also has anyone or many of you heard of the DNA frequencies being used and developed by Charlen Boehm.

Thanks to all involved with this facinating information
Coastalguy

[Daniel Bergman]

None of Bruce Stenulson's machines use a carrier frequency. He feels it is not needed and promotes electro-sensitivity. Although it may be possible to do it with an external frequency generator. I have thought of using my GB-4000 to drive it, but I need to buy one first.

Of course, it would be totally illegal to run it that way.

Dan Bergman

[Randall Haislip]

Dan is correct in that the 8ce EM+ unit does not incorporate a carrier frequency and it is also true that the unit does not need one.
The plasma field generated from the double bubble tubes is similar to a pulsed magnetic field in that the field penetrates 100% without the need for a carrier frequency.
Crane/pad devices, because they output dc electricity do require a carrier frequency to penetrate below skin debth though there is no garrantee that the "juice" will affect deep tissue organs. Though I hope it does.
I will say that the 8 or 9ce EM systems are not for everyone, these systems are for researchers who refuse to trust some manufacture to do their thinking for them! As is promoted by the maker of the Plasma Plus II on their webpage:
"The Plasma Plus II does all the thinking for you."
Thats the same song the medical profession sings. Thats the same song Preachers sing, thats the same song Politicians sing.....everybody knows whats best for you but you.
I realize many people do not have the desire to delve as deeply into frequency research and application as I do and it is indeed a Good thing that the mfg's. do. There are many other units out there that are excellent for normal people.
Though I have incorporated the use of Atler Robin's F-125 frequency generator to supply frequencies to the "8" I could have used Ken Uzalls, Frex 16 software and saved a lot of money.Or I could have used the GB4000 as a frequency generator without breaking any known laws.
The choices facing people getting into this field are daunting and am I glad I'm not one of them.
Best wishes
randall

[Randall Haislip]

Regarding the 8CE EM+ and Power:
I've been using this system for over a year now and at all power levels but never experienced anything to compare the last 24 hours.
Last evening I decided to run a frequency set for Clymadia pheunomiae(available from Char Bohem at DNA Pathogen Frequencies)
I set up the "8" to incorporate the use of 2, double bubble tubes and one grounding tube ( for the feet). I intutively chose the 4th power setting (150) from a possible 9.
To my astonishment, this lower power setting I seldom use was very uncomfortable to hold on to.
I surmised that the energy from tubes was being absorbed into my system by "something" like a sponge soaking up water.(hopefully Clymadia) Strictly a guess.
There is no way I could have held onto those tubes at the next power level up, which is where I normall start a run.
I went to bed that evening with my equaliberum "off"
I awoke this morning with the same condition with the added phenomon of being slightly incoherent....like being very mildly drunk.
After a few hours the conditions persisted...I called Bruce.
He suggested a set of frequencies to assist energy stabilization which I ran and after a nap got up feeling 95%.
Moral of the story: in your quest for more power, be carefull how you apply it. I certainly will be.
randall