Hi Nenah, I never speak for you, I just speak from my experience.
Usually, I use a very precise wording. Scientifically acceptable does not mean showing a slide that a supposed frequency killed a pathogen, or that one "feels" better.
You know the placebo effect and microbes have a very short lifespan anyways. So, was it really the frequency or something else? Where are the results of the control? How do we know that it was exactly that frequency and another frequency does not work? What is the mechanism? What is the success rate demonstrated with a blind study? Is it replicable?
I truly don't believe much in the conspiration theories. Just do the things how they should be done and they will be accepted.
I'm not aware of papers on cold plasma or electroporation that are forbidden, hidden or rejected in the U.S. Indeed, there are many new patents on Rife related technology.
I kindly disagree that am doing a disservice to people, as pointing out a lack of scientific evidence should bring up those questions that are for the benefit of all.
I don't have a conflict of interest either, as currently I just do pure research. I sell no books, no machines. If you claim that someone is doing a disservice, you must see your conflict of interest first.
So, we will just live with different opinions. I have found valid people in this forum with whom I share some research and opinions. Others have different ideas.
I had the idea, some day, to develop a website where everyone could contribute his lab tests, healing protocols, results. Forms and questions should be developed so that it may have scientific value. As you understand, "I feel good" or it heals my "nail, insomnia, itch, pointy nose, fill in the blank", which unfortunately seems to be the preferred way of most manufacturers, can actually harm people.
Research must follow protocols, people are not Guinea pigs. So, that's why I just do research and shared a lot of results on this forum freely. I see so many people claiming such unbelievable results and showing none. Or showing nothing that is scientifically acceptable, as I said.
Finally, just to point out a subtlety. Research needs a lab. That a doctor uses Rife therapy, it does not contribute much to research, as he does not have the facilities to do it. Of course, it can give an indication for further investigation, but that's it. Then, there are those who are satisfied, and those who want to understand more. My opinion, of course.





Reply With Quote