Can a Rife machine cure cancer?

[Annie Andrey]

Hi Will

This definitely sounds impressive, and I am so pleased for you, but I'm curious to know exacly what procedures you followed AFTERWARDS, to determine being cancer free.

Also, it would really help others, if you could somehow ask your friend to let you know the precise frequency treatments that he gave you and also most important, would be the brand and/or model of device that he used to treat you.

Were each of the 3 treatments 3 runs of the same treatment (set of frequencies), or 3 different treatments? eg. Detox, General Pain & General Cancer or possibly Detox, Colon_problems_general - 20, 440, 880, 1552, 802, 832 (See: CAFL - The Consolidated Annotated Frequency List http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioe...dotes/CAFL.htm )
and General Cancer or others?

Every bit of information helps, and the more precise, the better, as it saves those wishing to possibly perform the same, an enormous amount of guess work research (although still crucial, irrespective of the source) and thus loads of time.

Thanks for sharing this Will and looking forward to more ...

Blessings and congratulations!
@nnie

[William Smith]

Annie, he builds and sells these units as they have made some changes and he says what he makes are the most powerful units on the market and he sells them for approx. $3,000+ so I can't really tell you about his equipment and next week I hope to see him and find out the frequency's that was used for me and post them I had no side effects as I drank a gallon of water and you don't even know that you had a treatment except that you feel better each time.
that's all for now folks
God Bless
Bill

[Jim Berger]

Hello Everybody,

I thought I would add my two cents worth on the subject "Can a Rife machine cure cancer?"

I have been working with a friend with advanced stage ovarian cancer almost 3 years now and we have tried a number of different Rife units on the market with little success and in some cases detrimental effects (where the cancer dramatically increased). In particular, we tried a unit called Magnaphase, that had been identified as curing lung cancer in one patient, but dramitically increased the ovarian cancer of my friend. Analyzing the signal from the Magnaphase, I found that there was a ringing of frequencies through 17.034 MHz (17 meter wavelength), the setting of the 1934 device used to treat carcinoma during the very successful clinic held in La Jolla, CA in the summer of 1934. I suspect that there was enough power to destroy cancer in the lungs (being much easier to pentrate), but not down in the heavy organ area, where my friend's ovarian tumors thrived. If you don't get enough power at the right frequency to the tumor, you end up stimulating the cancer into growing more, rather than killing it, just as Rife said.

My friend also tried the Rife Bare device from RTI up in Canada and the Bluelight unit from Ed Heft, but found greater response from a functional replica of the AZ-58 I built based on the schematics from the www.rife.org website. We also tried working with the ICOM-718 transmitter sending a modulation frequency in via the ProCom function generator received with the RTI Rife-Bare unit, also to no avail. We worked at 11.78MHz, 17.034 MHz and 1.604 MHz carrier frequencies.

That first year we worked together (2003), we did get some tumor reduction, but a calcium deposit from prior killoff seemed to start covering and protecting the tumor. And so the tumor continued growing, substantially increasing when we tried the Magnaphase device.

I got into this research at the beginning of 2002 when my sister-in-law was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. She passed away in six months in a most tragic way, as many of you probably know. But in that six months I learned enough about Royal Raymond Rife to know that some of the most important discoveries in medical science were acheived and then lost due to the ignorance, corruption and/or greed of a few.

By the time my sister-in-law passed in July 2003, I was convinced that we must figure out how the 1934 machine that sucessfully cured 16 of 16 advanced stage incurable cancer paitients in several months time worked. I vowed at that time to continue this work until we as a community have rediscovered this technology. I do this in memory of Kathy Berger, my beloved sister-in-law.

Information on super-regeneration can still be obtained from the American Radio Relay Leauge website by obtaining the QST VIEW CD's for 1915-1929 @ $39.95. A series of articles from the August to December 1922 issues of the QST Magazine explain super-regeneration. The new Rife History document on www.rife.org and the Rife Forum is an excellent effort by AAA Productions to describe a possible scenario for the evolution of Rife Technology from the 1930's through the 1950's. However, my money is on the 1934 device and not the 1935 (Rife No. 4) device. I am not a Hoyland fan at all.

At the beginning of last year I started building a vacuum tube super-regeneration system that could allow me to get into the frequency range of the 1934 unit; however, several months into the design I had a brainstorm one night just before falling asleep, that perhaps I could simulate super-regeneration in software more easily. So I have temporarily put the completely hardware version of a super-regenerator on hold.

I did my programming in LabVIEW software (National Instruments being the largest Test & Measurement specific company in the USA), which I use extensively as an Electrical Engineer (working in the medical electronics industrty over 25 years). I started with the "Carol" cancer frequency research paper found on www.electroherbalism.com . I came up with a protocol based on that research paper. To simulate super-regeneration, I would build complex harmonic rich waveforms based on the cancer audio MORs used in the 1950's. The harmonic rich waveforms were built up with from 5 to 60 harmonics. In October I finally came across Dr. Jim Bare's paper "Understanding Our Frequencies Through Harmonic Associations". Likewise I built up protocols based on Jim's paper using anywhere from 5 to 50 harmonic waveforms for at least the cancer frequencies.

From Jul 2005 to Jan 2006 we got decrease's in my friend's CA-125 cancer antigen marker, from the low 900's to the low 500's. Note that she was also doing chemo. However, she was doing the same chemo without any improvements whatsoever, before we stated these protocol's last July.

After seeing the Bedini pages in December, I got some new ideas myself. I had been amplifing my modulation frequencies from my LabVIEW program/ Data Acquisition Board in my computer with my version of Aubrey Scoon's Booster Amplifer, but I was trying to keep the amplitude down to not over modulate. It then dawned on me that I needed to get more power to possibly penetrate the calcium deposit layer that seemed to protect the cancer still within the tumor. It seemed that we were able to kill the cancer outside the tumor but not within, since we hadn't had tumor reduction in over two years.

I found I could increase the input peak to peak voltage into the Scoon Booster amplifier by almost 4 times (to 2.5 Vpp input) without degrading my complex harmonic waveforms for super regeneration simulation. I was now getting out of the Scoon booster amp an 80 Volt peak to peak waveform to modulate the RF carrier in the AZ-58 via the grid of the 812 transmitting tube. We tried sub-hamonic and harmonic carrier frequencies based on both the 1934 (Rife No. 3) and 1935 (Rife No. 4) units. She felt the greatest effect at 4.26 MHz (the 4th sub-harmonic of 17.034 MHz) and less effect at 3.2 MHz (the 2nd harmonic of 1.604 MHz). I also added a gate frequency at this time to further simulate super-regeneration, where the grid circuit is turned off half a cycle. Using a 1000 V probe to measure that output at my phanotron tube resulted in an offscale reading on my oscilloscope > 8000 Volts peak to peak suggesting that super-regeneration might actually be taking place with this setup.

Since January we have had sporadic increases in CA-125 cancer anti-gen marker tests; however at the last doctor's exam, the doctor was able to feel the back side of the tumor and for the first time in years instead of the gritty hardness of the calcium deposit, he felt the smooth soft tissue of the layer formerly beneath. There was also evidence of a depression in the tumor (hopefully indicating killoff). That was just a couple weeks ago.

My friend Marlene's niece' a massage therapist, also began palipating the tumor trying to break up the calcium wall.

Over the past couple months, Marlene has been doing blood smears at time intervals between treatments. An hour after a light treatment we see numerous big particles of tissue. Eight hours after the treatment, there appears to be muddy looking rivlets within the smear, that I wonder whether might be the tissue debris being broken down by the white cells. Sixteen hours in the number of big particles has decreased and the blood starts clearing up again. So this I believe is the Herxheimer effect as seen in the blood.

I pray that this continues and that we are close to rediscovering the Rife Effect observed during the 1934 cancer clinic. I thank for my courageous friend Marlene, who five years after late diagnosis of ovarian cancer, is still not on any pain meds, and God willing will she her first grandchild born this summer.

This post contains 5 attachments. May God bless you all in your search for truth, health and happiness.

Jim Berger

Attachments:

1. Sample of Carol, Bare and frequency spread protocols = Super Regen Sim1.doc
2. Increasing harmonics protocol sample, sample multiharmonic waveform, sample info saved to report = Super Regen Sim2.doc
3. Ovarian Cancer Blood Smears 1st two 1 hour after treatment, 2nd two 8 hours after treatment, 3rd two 16 hours after treatment = Blood Smears Ovarian Cancer.doc
4. AZ-58 Semi-Solid State proto photos 1 = AZ-58 Semi-Solid State Proto1.doc
5. AZ-58 Semi-Solid State proto photos 2 = AZ-58 Semi-Solid State Proto2.doc

[William Smith]

The key factor for not having any problems after a treatment is drinking at least one gallon of water starting 15 min before time of treatment and finishing way before you go to bed as when I had my treatments never even felt any problems
God Bless
Bill

[Annie Andrey]

Thanks for all that valuable info Jim!

I have never attempted to help anyone with cancer myself, although I have offered to loan a couple my device ... nobody's ever accepted though, because until very recently I'd never heard of anyone with any testimonials that were sufficiently conclusive and/or convincing for me, yet listening to some 'developers' (nothing short of entrepreneurs, often with zilch knowledge in this technology) and re-sellers of this equipment "Rife IS a MAGIC BULLET, and has cured THOUSANDS of people with cancer!".

As you have also experienced
"But in that six months I learned enough about Royal Raymond Rife to know that some of the most important discoveries in medical science were acheived and then lost due to the ignorance, corruption and/or greed of a few."


Any false hope and worse still, blatant lies really upsets and even angers me, esp. knowing that quite a few are simply doing this for the $$$ and nothing to do with the poor folks' well-being. In my personal experience, as the general public are becoming more aware of Natural & Alternative Therapies, so the Gravy Train appears to be becoming increasingly popular.

Blessings,
@nnie

[Jim Berger]

Thanks Bill,

Marlene is very good at drinking plenty of water throughout the day, as well as before and after treatment. I will send this on to her.

Jim

[Jim Berger]

Dear Annie,

I truly believe, we are close to rediscovering the Rife Effect of the 1934 clinic. I will have much to share as Marlene and I progress in our study together over the next few months.

Bless you for leading the struggle on the Rife Forum.

Jim Berger

[Robert Turner]

I would Like to put my two cents in as well. First of all I was looking for a machine 2002 2003 and found the site of the B-3 ultimate rife and also found the first balanced explanation of all the aspects of the Rife story pad plasma pros cons etc. without any bias! Just the facts, no one had been as informative up to this point. Mr. Garff has shown more true concern that any one else that I have looked into and talked to. The GB4000 is a benchmark that everyone will eventually have to honor.

I for one am tired of the bitching about price for something that can free anyone who wants from all disease! Most of you are using a computer that costs more than the price of the BG4000!!

I have been using this machine and have had nothing but great results!!

and I don't Dick around when it comes to finding the real thing!!!

I guess you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink
Robert

Did it occur to anyone that someone has rediscovered the Rife Effect????

[Jim Berger]

Hello Robert,

I first met Jeff Garff at the Rife Conference in Las Vegas, NV in 2002. Jeff and I have been sharing information on our respective research, since that time. Jeff asked and I complied reviewing and commenting on his latest Rife History document before it's recent publication on this forum. I believe Jeff will be the first to tell you that his GB-4000 works very well on just about everything expect cancer or at least advanced stage cancer.

The elimination of advanced stage cancer has been my total focus thus far.

I believe by a combined effort on all of our parts, we will bring back that original technology that worked so well.

I agree that Jeff Garff, is a researcher of the highest integrity, in which he has shown again in the latest Rife History release. As can be seen in that article, Jeff has also become a convert in the thought that the key to understanding the Rife effect might lie in that original super-regeneration technology. Jeff's view is that the 1935 unit is the unit to focus on, while I believe the 1934 unit is the unit to focus. I am just springboarding off Jeff's Rife History, with a summary of actual work that validates that theory, both Jeff and I are investigating.

I am sure Jeff will jump in if I have any of this too far wrong.

Best Regards,

Jim Berger

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Jim & Robert,

I met Jim in Las Vegas as he said in his post. Since then we have been sharing our research and I consider Jim a good friend. He is one of the few people I know that would give you the shirt off of his back. I respect him very much and his work which he has been doing on super-regeneration. I believe super-regeneration is the way Rife's instruments worked and his lab notes and other documents show this was the case. As Jim stated, I had him read over the document I wrote about how Rife's instruments worked to help double check what I wrote. Super-regeneration and how it worked made me have to rewrite almost the whole document because almost everything we believed about Rife's instruments was not correct. Everything from page 6 to 35 has changed and I wanted to make it so those who read it could understand super-regeneration. The paper is on Rife.org.

Both Jim's and my focus has been to get an instrument to work the same as the 1934 instrument. But what I would really like is an instrument that worked the way Dr. Johnson's instrument did. It eliminated every organism at the same time. Super-regeneration is the only way you could accomplish this. You can read about his instrument on page 31 of the article. Right now both Jim and I are working on super-regeneration instruments. We have seen, as everyone else has, that cancer is a very tough bug to eliminate. Both Jim and I both have had people test 2008, 2128 hertz along with 1,604,000, 11,430,000, 11,780,000 and 17,033,000 MHz and have seen as much failure as success.

Best wishes,

Jeff Garff

[Annie Andrey]

Dear Jim and Jeff

You are both to be so highly commended - for your relentless & thorough research, your honesty and integrity, and mostly, for your willingness to share so unselfishly, for the betterment of ALL mankind.

THANK YOU from myself, and my fellow country folk who shall, amongst millions of others worldwide, one day, undoubtedly benefit immensely.

With blessings and spiritual guidance always,
@nnie

[Tom Basilio]

I would Like to put my two cents in as well. First of all I was looking for a machine 2002 2003 and found the site of the B-3 ultimate rife and also found the first balanced explanation of all the aspects of the Rife story pad plasma pros cons etc. without any bias! Just the facts, no one had been as informative up to this point. Mr. Garff has shown more true concern that any one else that I have looked into and talked to. The GB4000 is a benchmark that everyone will eventually have to honor.

I for one am tired of the bitching about price for something that can free anyone who wants from all disease! Most of you are using a computer that costs more than the price of the BG4000!!

I have been using this machine and have had nothing but great results!!

and I don't Dick around when it comes to finding the real thing!!!

I guess you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink
Robert

Did it occur to anyone that someone has rediscovered the Rife Effect????

I agree totally with you - I am an (ex) radar, radio, and audio technician/designer and I did at least two years of research before buying the GB4000. A friend of mine who is a scientist and a healer has traditionally been using laser systems (of his own design) with incredible success in curing cancer but he was so excited with the GB4000 that he bought two. I believe he uses them more than his laser system now and is still curing cancer of varied types. My recommendation to anyone attempting this however is that you try putting your body in an alkaline state as well (1Tspn of baking soda a day will usually do that) and take at least five drops of FOOD GRADE (don't use anything else!!) hydrogen peroxide once or twice a day. Cancer supposedly can't survive in an alkaline environment, and cancer cells (I understand) don't like oxygen. There are many additional things that you can do but this is a great place to start.

[Susana Moore]

To Jim B.I would of course stop the chemo as no good results anyway.Its overal efficiency of 2.1% is poor anyway.A much better idea is the herbal curcumin contained in tumeric used in curry.Curcumin fights cancer in 12 diffrent ways which no drug is even allowed to do.susana

[James Bare]

Susana,

Curcumin is a form of chemotherapy. A chemically based treatment of cancer.

You are quite correct - outcomes from the use of medically based chemotherapy is often poor. But regardless of how poor it is - the great majority of people with serious cancers are subjected to it. My paper was a way to enhance the effect not just of chemotherapy, but that of frequency devices too. Patient outcome is all that is ultimately important.

The paper is a bridge between the existing treatment chemical model and what will be the future, i.e. frequency therapy. The combination of the two treatment systems is how the future seems to be unfolding. There is world wide research going on into the synergistic effects of pulsed fields and chemotherapy. My paper tried to take this research and give it coherence, and a direction to strive for. The paper gets downloaded off my web sites a few hundred times a month. Many of these downloads go to universities and research institutes.

I recently posted an abstract to the forum from a paper to be published in the next month which seems to be a direct outcome of the ideas presented in my paper.

Take a close look at some of the postings in this thread. You will see that people are using forms of chemotherapy with their frequency devices to achieve excellent outcomes.

Jim Bare

To Jim B.I would of course stop the chemo as no good results anyway.Its overal efficiency of 2.1% is poor anyway.A much better idea is the herbal curcumin contained in tumeric used in curry.Curcumin fights cancer in 12 diffrent ways which no drug is even allowed to do.susana

[Susana Moore]

Curcumin as chemotherapy-well if you like,butwhat other chemo can you obtain by eating lots of curry?i would not like to take a drug or real chemo which by fda rules can only act on cancer in one respect but curcumin does the action in 12 different ways so would be not allowed by fda.I prefer to consider it as herbal but you do as you wish.

[Zvonko Petroski]

Curcumin as chemotherapy-well if you like,butwhat other chemo can you obtain by eating lots of curry?i would not like to take a drug or real chemo which by fda rules can only act on cancer in one respect but curcumin does the action in 12 different ways so would be not allowed by fda.I prefer to consider it as herbal but you do as you wish.

Hi, I am new in this wonderful forum and this is my baptism with my very new post. I prefer too that curcumin is herbal, but not at all chfemotherapy. It helps in its ordinary usage iin daily life, as spice in soup or salads, or consuming in capsules. Helps in may places, at prostate, any genital disorders (and maintaining good health here), better processing food in a stomack, small instestines and colon.

[Hap Crater]

Hello Jim,

I am new to the forum and have a question about some lines in your 4/06 post>>>See quote below<<

Hello Everybody,

I thought I would add my two cents worth on the subject "Can a Rife machine cure cancer?"

I have been working with a friend with advanced stage ovarian cancer almost 3 years now and we have tried a number of different Rife units on the market with little success and in some cases detrimental effects (where the cancer dramatically increased). In particular, we tried a unit called Magnaphase, that had been identified as curing lung cancer in one patient, but dramitically increased the ovarian cancer of my friend. Analyzing the signal from the Magnaphase, I found that there was a ringing of frequencies through 17.034 MHz (17 meter wavelength), the setting of the 1934 device used to treat carcinoma during the very successful clinic held in La Jolla, CA in the summer of 1934. I suspect that there was enough power to destroy cancer in the lungs (being much easier to pentrate), but not down in the heavy organ area, where my friend's ovarian tumors thrived. If you don't get enough power at the right frequency to the tumor, you end up stimulating the cancer into growing more, rather than killing it, just as Rife said.

The question I have is about the optimal use of the pad devices in terms of their placement. The woman who recommended my Rife device has had a remarkable success in treating her breast cancer. She told me that she places the pads between her upper arms firm against her breast area above the tumors. It seems that from what you are saying above that the placement could be very important. What would be the ideal placement for prostate cancer? One I have been trying is laying down with one pad on my groin and one on my lower back. That has symmetry. How important is symmetry of placement I wonder. For example in analogy to the breast cancer example I gave above one would think that placing one of the pads on the crouch area would be called for. But there does not appear to be any symmtrical area for placement there.

Thanks in advance for any ideas here.

Hap Crater

[Don Richards]

Hap, what device are you using? Don Richards

[Rob Cassteele]

According to the book Blast It (by John Crane with information about pad use on prostate cancer the positive pad should be put about a fist above the coccyx. So you could lay on one pad, and hold the other pad (neg.) a fist below the belly button. According to the book Barley Green can also help restore cells and purify the blood stream so that oxygen can reach all parts of the body.

Rob

[Hap Crater]

Thanks Don and Rob for your replies. The device I own is a PFG-100.
I assume just like my starter jump cable links that red is positive and black is negative.

Another question: I have been using one of the 6 or so prostate frequencies 4 days a week for about 6 minutes a session. On a fifth day I spend about 1/2 hour cycling through all of the frequencies (it spends about 1 minute then goes to the next). I am not sure if it is known which is more effective. It seems that focusing on one frequency at a time would be more likely to have the desired effect as 1 minute may not be enough time for the virus to be destroyed. Do Crane or Rife give any indication on this?

Thanks

Hap

Hap