Can a Rife machine cure cancer?

[Westley Chang]

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply.

I noticed from your message the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set at 27 Mhz versus the GB4000 set at 2.1MHz to 3.6MHZ. I am not clear on why the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set so high versus the GB4000.

If possible, could you possibly explain the differences between a machine with a higher carrier frequency compared to a machine with a lower carrier frequency such as the GB4000?

Is it better to have a higher carrier frequency?

I noticed that the GB4000 has a higher "Frequency Range in Hertz" but not sure what that has to do with carrier frequency.

Any clarification would be enormously appreciated!

Thanks!

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westly,

My answers will probably cause you to have more questions. You can call and I will do my best to answer all your questions.

Jeff Garff
888-486-4420

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply.

I noticed from your message the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set at 27 Mhz versus the GB4000 set at 2.1MHz to 3.6MHZ. I am not clear on why the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set so high versus the GB4000.

If possible, could you possibly explain the differences between a machine with a higher carrier frequency compared to a machine with a lower carrier frequency such as the GB4000?

Is it better to have a higher carrier frequency?

I noticed that the GB4000 has a higher "Frequency Range in Hertz" but not sure what that has to do with carrier frequency.

Any clarification would be enormously appreciated!

Thanks!

Regards,

Wes

[Judith Dew]

I used a very simple EMEM with plasma tube and hand-held signal generator. The frequencies were in the very low to low range.
I'm trying to contact the builder, but he's hard to get hold of. He gave me the frequency set - and it had a positive track record.
A protege of his used it for metastasized breast cancer in the lymph nodes and lung. Who would have guessed that 4 years later
I'd be asking the question, "How did it work?" I was living in a different paradigm!

The fact that he used frequencies associated with superstition is dumb-founding. Congratulations on your outcomes. I don't know
in what direction the book I've almost finished will take me. It's been a long, arduous process, and I feel like a completely
different person. Keep up the very excellent work! Judith Dew

[Brenda Jackson]

Judith how are you getting on with your book?

[Judith Dew]

I am far along. I hit a wall when my youngest son developed cancer in his
eye, and it had to be removed. It was a traumatized eye, and he went
ahead with the biopsy, and the doctor removed his eye without adequate
permission. I've found a world-class hospital in Mexico that does system
perfusion hyperthermia, ozone, and many more kinds of progressive treat-
ments, so we're getting his diet on track - and assessing what needs to be
done. My book is complex in that it approaches cancer the way Dr. Kelley
and Dr. Gonzalez approach it - which is that each of us has individualized
nutritional needs, so his diet isn't the standard cancer diet. Thanks for
asking. It will certainly have a different ending than what I conceived. It's
a whole different story when you've lived the reality that there is NO one
standard cancer diet. This all just happened last week, so I'm going to
talk to a doctor who is an expert in metabolic typing and get some of my
questions answered. Now, the same questions I had for my book are the
very questions I need answers to about my son. He's a Parasympathetic
Dominant, and I don't know if he would respond favorably to many of the
high alkaline protocols that most people think they need. Believe me,
when I have this under my hat, I'll be a happy camper. Blessings to you.

[Russell Shipp]

YES high alkaline. .. Ozonate, Rife and colloidal silver...

THANK GOD you were there... Losing an eye is like... NOPE NOPE NOPE.


Great on you being aware and awesome!!!

[Mark Le Huray]

YES high alkaline. .. Ozonate, Rife and colloidal silver...

THANK GOD you were there... Losing an eye is like... NOPE NOPE NOPE.


Great on you being aware and awesome!!!

I read that you shouldn't take ozonated water at the same time as rife therapy but that it should be done afterwards?

Has anyone tried doing MMS and rife as part of a full cancer treatment? It seems like that would be pretty potent.

[Russell Shipp]

I read that you shouldn't take ozonated water at the same time as rife therapy but that it should be done afterwards?

Has anyone tried doing MMS and rife as part of a full cancer treatment? It seems like that would be pretty potent.

You should enjoy some ozanted both before and after a Rife session for maximum results.

I avoid MMS like the plague. Some swear by it but the same folks that swear by it use it daily because they are always sick. Hypercondria. ugh. So personal experience has seriously biased me against it ...

I believe it could be useful as a once in a while thing just like Rifeing once in a awhile is good but I aint sure it should be done every day. If you are doing something every single day and still not getting better double check what your doing.

[Peter Barta]

I am looking through all of your input, and surprised how many different gadgets are called Rife machine.
In my understanding none of what I see here are to do anything with Rife, and his works! I do not deny that some make good result in many cases, but is a difference to get some result, and to claim that it is Rife technology. First : Rife used tube oscillator, tube amplifier and Phanotron tube probably filled with argon, or a mixture of it. until I build my gadget according to my filtered out research I can not comment on cancer cure, apart from the historical records that Rife did cure cancer probably with 100% result.
If any of you can do more research I appreciate.
A STORY is circulating : once a machine in Rife's laboratory was malfunctioned, and the result was that ALL specimen in that laboratory DIED ! --but nobody wants to talk about the details, or nobody know?

[John A. Knight]

Peter,

Yes, it is remarkable the wide variety of machines that are labelled Rife. I think today people call anything that is a frequency generator a Rife machine. But it is difficult to peg down precisely what a "Rife Machine" is. Even those machines that Rife himself was involved with in some fashion differ substantially. People who have researched these in depth like Jeff Garff and Jim Berger, both of whom posted to this thread early on, would probably go so far as to distinguish between particular models of Rife's early machines when discussing technical merits of a "Rife Machine". see http://www.rifevideos.com/what_is_a_...e_machine.html

Since this thread seems to wander and you're building a machine, a side note about plasma tube gases and electrodes might help you when you choose a plasma tube. Rife used helium but I think he said it didn't matter. However, it may matter over the long term, particularly with an internal electrode style tube. Helium is apparently much more resistant to degradation over time. The ionized gas (any noble gas mixture) is incredibly caustic and rips apart anything it touches including internal electrodes and glass walls. The elements that are torn off these surfaces combine with the noble gas(es) and reduce conductivity to the point of failure.

Helium is apparently the most resistant to this phenomenon. This probably matters most with internal electrode tubes. I believe Rife used helium in his tube. Possibly for this reason. With an external electrode tube the fouling problem appears to be much less significant, so it's probably not a big deal there. I believe Garff said somewhere on this forum that he has 3 external electrode tubes having mixed gases he uses a lot and they are at least 2 years old with no darkening.

Even helium filled tubes will darken though with enough use. However, apparently Rife said even when completely dark they continued to work just fine. The loss of visible spectrum frequencies didn't matter in this case, at least according to Rife. This is in contrast to a tube having anything else. A dark tube in that case will indicate increasing resistance which will mean a decrease in output and possibly distortion, and eventual failure of your amplifier if you're not careful.

So, as I build my machine, at the moment I've settled on helium for internal electrode tubes and anything for external electrode tubes. External electrode tubes can support much larger outputs since the electrode is bigger and isn't subjected to the terrible environment. Internal electrodes can convey signals more accurately. So it depends on your goal. There is apparently no perfect solution for all situations.

This information is largely by private correspondence with Ralph Hartwell who builds pad and plasma tube amplifiers and Jeff Garff who builds the GB4000 system. They've both been active contributors to understanding and using Rife technology a long time and are both very helpful.

I hope it helps you, too.

John

[Judith Dew]

He was using colloidal silver in the eye before the worst happened. Should he be using it orally? I'm so on tilt I haven't thought about it since then. Thanks for responding. It means a lot.

[Russell Shipp]

He was using colloidal silver in the eye before the worst happened. Should he be using it orally? I'm so on tilt I haven't thought about it since then. Thanks for responding. It means a lot.

Both. I'd recommend both.

[John Fackler]

Eye cancer is getting to be wide spread occurance ,, any Ideas what is causing this type of cancer to manifest?