Hello Everybody,
I thought I would add my two cents worth on the subject "Can a Rife machine cure cancer?"
I have been working with a friend with advanced stage ovarian cancer almost 3 years now and we have tried a number of different Rife units on the market with little success and in some cases detrimental effects (where the cancer dramatically increased). In particular, we tried a unit called Magnaphase, that had been identified as curing lung cancer in one patient, but dramitically increased the ovarian cancer of my friend. Analyzing the signal from the Magnaphase, I found that there was a ringing of frequencies through 17.034 MHz (17 meter wavelength), the setting of the 1934 device used to treat carcinoma during the very successful clinic held in La Jolla, CA in the summer of 1934. I suspect that there was enough power to destroy cancer in the lungs (being much easier to pentrate), but not down in the heavy organ area, where my friend's ovarian tumors thrived. If you don't get enough power at the right frequency to the tumor, you end up stimulating the cancer into growing more, rather than killing it, just as Rife said.
My friend also tried the Rife Bare device from RTI up in Canada and the Bluelight unit from Ed Heft, but found greater response from a functional replica of the AZ-58 I built based on the schematics from the www.rife.org website. We also tried working with the ICOM-718 transmitter sending a modulation frequency in via the ProCom function generator received with the RTI Rife-Bare unit, also to no avail. We worked at 11.78MHz, 17.034 MHz and 1.604 MHz carrier frequencies.
That first year we worked together (2003), we did get some tumor reduction, but a calcium deposit from prior killoff seemed to start covering and protecting the tumor. And so the tumor continued growing, substantially increasing when we tried the Magnaphase device.
I got into this research at the beginning of 2002 when my sister-in-law was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. She passed away in six months in a most tragic way, as many of you probably know. But in that six months I learned enough about Royal Raymond Rife to know that some of the most important discoveries in medical science were acheived and then lost due to the ignorance, corruption and/or greed of a few.
By the time my sister-in-law passed in July 2003, I was convinced that we must figure out how the 1934 machine that sucessfully cured 16 of 16 advanced stage incurable cancer paitients in several months time worked. I vowed at that time to continue this work until we as a community have rediscovered this technology. I do this in memory of Kathy Berger, my beloved sister-in-law.
Information on super-regeneration can still be obtained from the American Radio Relay Leauge website by obtaining the QST VIEW CD's for 1915-1929 @ $39.95. A series of articles from the August to December 1922 issues of the QST Magazine explain super-regeneration. The new Rife History document on www.rife.org and the Rife Forum is an excellent effort by AAA Productions to describe a possible scenario for the evolution of Rife Technology from the 1930's through the 1950's. However, my money is on the 1934 device and not the 1935 (Rife No. 4) device. I am not a Hoyland fan at all.
At the beginning of last year I started building a vacuum tube super-regeneration system that could allow me to get into the frequency range of the 1934 unit; however, several months into the design I had a brainstorm one night just before falling asleep, that perhaps I could simulate super-regeneration in software more easily. So I have temporarily put the completely hardware version of a super-regenerator on hold.
I did my programming in LabVIEW software (National Instruments being the largest Test & Measurement specific company in the USA), which I use extensively as an Electrical Engineer (working in the medical electronics industrty over 25 years). I started with the "Carol" cancer frequency research paper found on www.electroherbalism.com . I came up with a protocol based on that research paper. To simulate super-regeneration, I would build complex harmonic rich waveforms based on the cancer audio MORs used in the 1950's. The harmonic rich waveforms were built up with from 5 to 60 harmonics. In October I finally came across Dr. Jim Bare's paper "Understanding Our Frequencies Through Harmonic Associations". Likewise I built up protocols based on Jim's paper using anywhere from 5 to 50 harmonic waveforms for at least the cancer frequencies.
From Jul 2005 to Jan 2006 we got decrease's in my friend's CA-125 cancer antigen marker, from the low 900's to the low 500's. Note that she was also doing chemo. However, she was doing the same chemo without any improvements whatsoever, before we stated these protocol's last July.
After seeing the Bedini pages in December, I got some new ideas myself. I had been amplifing my modulation frequencies from my LabVIEW program/ Data Acquisition Board in my computer with my version of Aubrey Scoon's Booster Amplifer, but I was trying to keep the amplitude down to not over modulate. It then dawned on me that I needed to get more power to possibly penetrate the calcium deposit layer that seemed to protect the cancer still within the tumor. It seemed that we were able to kill the cancer outside the tumor but not within, since we hadn't had tumor reduction in over two years.
I found I could increase the input peak to peak voltage into the Scoon Booster amplifier by almost 4 times (to 2.5 Vpp input) without degrading my complex harmonic waveforms for super regeneration simulation. I was now getting out of the Scoon booster amp an 80 Volt peak to peak waveform to modulate the RF carrier in the AZ-58 via the grid of the 812 transmitting tube. We tried sub-hamonic and harmonic carrier frequencies based on both the 1934 (Rife No. 3) and 1935 (Rife No. 4) units. She felt the greatest effect at 4.26 MHz (the 4th sub-harmonic of 17.034 MHz) and less effect at 3.2 MHz (the 2nd harmonic of 1.604 MHz). I also added a gate frequency at this time to further simulate super-regeneration, where the grid circuit is turned off half a cycle. Using a 1000 V probe to measure that output at my phanotron tube resulted in an offscale reading on my oscilloscope > 8000 Volts peak to peak suggesting that super-regeneration might actually be taking place with this setup.
Since January we have had sporadic increases in CA-125 cancer anti-gen marker tests; however at the last doctor's exam, the doctor was able to feel the back side of the tumor and for the first time in years instead of the gritty hardness of the calcium deposit, he felt the smooth soft tissue of the layer formerly beneath. There was also evidence of a depression in the tumor (hopefully indicating killoff). That was just a couple weeks ago.
My friend Marlene's niece' a massage therapist, also began palipating the tumor trying to break up the calcium wall.
Over the past couple months, Marlene has been doing blood smears at time intervals between treatments. An hour after a light treatment we see numerous big particles of tissue. Eight hours after the treatment, there appears to be muddy looking rivlets within the smear, that I wonder whether might be the tissue debris being broken down by the white cells. Sixteen hours in the number of big particles has decreased and the blood starts clearing up again. So this I believe is the Herxheimer effect as seen in the blood.
I pray that this continues and that we are close to rediscovering the Rife Effect observed during the 1934 cancer clinic. I thank for my courageous friend Marlene, who five years after late diagnosis of ovarian cancer, is still not on any pain meds, and God willing will she her first grandchild born this summer.
This post contains 5 attachments. May God bless you all in your search for truth, health and happiness.
Jim Berger
Attachments:
- Sample of Carol, Bare and frequency spread protocols = Super Regen Sim1.doc
- Increasing harmonics protocol sample, sample multiharmonic waveform, sample info saved to report = Super Regen Sim2.doc
- Ovarian Cancer Blood Smears 1st two 1 hour after treatment, 2nd two 8 hours after treatment, 3rd two 16 hours after treatment = Blood Smears Ovarian Cancer.doc
- AZ-58 Semi-Solid State proto photos 1 = AZ-58 Semi-Solid State Proto1.doc
- AZ-58 Semi-Solid State proto photos 2 = AZ-58 Semi-Solid State Proto2.doc
Reply With Quote