Can a Rife machine cure cancer?

[Daniel Bergman]

I do not see any instructions that are specific to that particular type of cancer. It is fairly detailed as to how long to run in the beginning and warnings. It basically says start with short durations and build up while monitoring reactions. There are quite a few cancer frequencies listed.
I would check it against the CAFL and NCFL. There could be more there.

I certainly would gather all of the information you can since there is no specific protocol that I know of. I know that there are others here with some experience with cancer. Hopefully they can shed some light on the subject.

I would think finding the specific working frequency would be the most difficult part. I would try to find some early in the process by running sweeps in the range of the listed frequencies and hopefully some sensation will be felt. I do this for Lyme and I have found that quite often the listed frequency is slightly higher than the one that seems to cause a reaction.

Good Luck

Dan Bergman

[Hans Gimpelj]

Hi Dan,

One of the biggest problems on this Forum is that I havn't yet found an individual section pertaining to cancer of the lung, further more I have read hundreds of posts and none of them (at least not obvious) relate to lung cancer or have been posted by people treating lung cancer.


Me thinks there should be an (optional) entry in the left-hand section under one's Avarta that mentions what type illness they are treating this would help everyone greatly when reading someone's post.


Kind regards

[Bil Green]

I've heard good things about the GB4000 and how easy it is to operate. For those that can afford one I certainly recommend it.

As far as the free Rife programs for PC, they don't have a lot of features. Such as sweeps, wobble, the ability to click on almost any condition (in the menu) and choose from mulitple frequency sets and run them.

Not everyone that can't afford the best equipment is pennyless. A high end Rife program such as Frex is a great alternative and very affordable. And the frequency sets are extremely configurable on the fly.

I always ask people what their budget is and then recommend the best Rife equipment they can afford. The GB4000 is definately high on the list (as is a good EMEM device).

[Hans Gimpelj]

Hi Guys,

I am due to receive my Rife equipment (GB-4000/SR-4) shortly and I now have a very important question to ask.


Is there an "optimum" time of the day for the treatment/use of the Rife machine.


I am looking for an direct answer that does not drift into other areas of discussion such as drinking water, immune system cleansing etc.

Kind regards

[Frank Verdi]

Hi Hans:

It is a personal opinion that the optimal time is when it’s most convenient to your respective schedule with your Mom.

Rife machines do not work better or worse at different times of the day (unless you are in India) – Bodies do.

For lung cancer, select the time of day when the lungs shelter the maximal body energy – Googling “acupuncture” & also “lungs”, you will discover that 2-hour timeframe. I would use its median as target.

Also depending on one’s astrological ascendant, it corresponds to the physical body, so the 2 hour period governing one’s ascendant would be a time when physical body therapies are most appropriate & bear the greatest chance of yielding success..

Another traditional science involving magnetism & body polarities is yoga - Specifically I am referring to yoga’s ida, pingala, & sushumna etheric channels corresponding to the American Cancer Society’s symbol, the caduceus - Bodywise, it looks 100% like a spinal column.

A 90 degree spinal rotation displays 2 sine waves, 180 degrees out of phase, and the sushumna (zero or the y-axis after rotation).

Incorporating an “As Above/So Below” tenet, there are two time periods daily when the ida & pingala naturally balance into the sushumna. Without explanation, let me just state that we are more familiar denoting these times as “dusk” & “dawn” – During these periods, the body’s ethereal centers are more accessible.…

So those are the “best guess” Rife times, but their degree of gain may be mathematically insignificant…

God Bless As Always,

Frank

[Rob Cassteele]

If you first stick with the fabric settings you will see results (from more pain, herx to feeling a bit better or pain to no pain)
The fabric setting is 5 minutes per 8 frequencies low or 2 frequencies high.
Using only the GB4000 on RF (without amplifier) over hand and footplates can be hard, if you do it full power, the machine chokes on some frequencies.
The GB as stand allone with RF function is however very suitable for local use on scin dissorders or in other local treatment.
If you only want to use low frequencies like the Crane and CAFL frequencies, you can not use the 10W amp but the output of the GB is very strong!
I use to use this setting for muscle pain and less serious things.
Most of the time I use the GB with Amp over the whole body, but in cases of intestinal problems and cleanings I use the foot pads over the treatment area front back, like liver etc.
You best use the wet cloth covers, if you do not, there is a chance for little burnings!
So good conduction over the pads is a pre.

In have only been experimenting so far with the duty cycle, it seem that Rife High frequencies can be better run with a duty cycle of 50% instead of the fabric setting of 90% (wich works best for all low frequencies.

Earleir tests of John Crane have proven that even Crane frequencies can be effective, the builders of the Crane Audio device however did fabric a bad product, and this may be the main reason why the Crane frequencies work less good or not at all.

There has been a very unfair frequency trade, so that effective frequencies were sold to the highest bidder. Even the inventor of the FSCAN models was a victom of that traders, but also had done his homework very bad: There are no low Rife frequencies.

Once you have the universal frequency list that comes with the GB, it will get clear that the builders must almost have known Rife or real Rife asociates.

Even if you look very hard, you will not be able to discover but only a few original Rife frequencies, all calculated down to Herz, while Rife only used cycles per seccond. Some notes that are found contain more that 3 differend kinds of handwriting, so even if it were original Rife notes, what of the 3 hands was from the real Rife?

I still think (after a study from 1997-2003) that the GB4000 is an affordable machine that even Rife may have aproved (or build).

I have no vega test, no microscope and lack a lot to make my own diagnose, so I have to rely on the information that people give me.
If you treat a local strep infection with staph frequencies the effect can be a lot less than expected.
But in most cases that the GB4000 has no effect, the information and diagnose are wrong!

I received an attachment with interesting information to use the gate option with the curing cancer frequencies. On the other hand I have a problem with it, the gate values are 2008 and 2128 Hz and these are Crane related, and therefore not my first choice. We have no practice that get 10 cancer patients a day.

The maximum time I have used for treatment with the GB is 30 minutes, but that is even for a GB doing lets say 24 frequencies 1 and a half hour.
In some cases you have to treat long and often before you see results, but that is because 10 W is a lot less than the original power used by Rife.
It depend on age and condition to choose a daily or once in 3 day schedule.
On acute infections (most intestine) I go on untill I see relief, and repeat the sets that give instant relief, untill most of the sympthoms are gone (like pain nausea diarea etc).

With a choice of over 800 conditions, without a good diagnose, working with a GB can still feel like a needle in a haystack.

Rob

[Hans Gimpelj]

Hi Frank,

Thankyou for that infomation but "dawn" is not going to be an option for my Mother, she has been retired for many years now and I know for a fact that she dosn't get up untill around 8:30 am these days. I would have to imagine a time just before or after lunch (don't know if full or empty stomach (food not water) has any significance regarding treatment) I do know that she will need to drink a couple of litres of water before treatment starts and more water after treatment. I'll be lucky if I can get her to drink just a couple of glasses of water in any one day

Kind regards

[Sara Klein Ridgley]

According to the research group in China headed by Dr. Ian MacLeod, the besdt times for Rife treatments (or at least his kind of frequency treatments) is first thing in the morning before eating anything, and last thing at night at least 3 hours after dinner.

Sara

[Bil Green]

Hi Hans,

A sweep can be effective even if you never know exactly which frequencies were needed. Some people run a broad sweep, such as 300 - 3,000Hz in 1Hz steps. You can set the duration for each step at 1 second (as example).

This would equal a total of 2700 seconds or 45 minutes. This range covers most of the common frequencies used, so it's likely that in many cases you would get results (although in some cases the duration for each step may need to be longer).

Of course you can run the sweep more than once if needed.

[Hans Gimpelj]

Hi Bil,

Many thanks for your answer but my main concern still is as I posted in my previous message.

Just how affective is scanning if there is a posible delay in the response to any one particular frequency, you would never know which frequency the patient responed to. This could take a very long time and terminal patients don't often have this privalige.

Kind regards

[Daniel Bergman]

Hans,

I think you are under the impression that a person could have run one good effective frequency earlier and feel it later when running a noneffective one. I believe that you will ether feel it at the time it is running or not at all. In another words if 666 is an effective cancer killing frequency and you run it for 30 seconds and nothing is felt then nothing will be felt later either. You may have to run it longer for a sensation to be felt but it will not produce a sensation after the fact. At least I have never heard of that happening or experienced it personally.

If you are doing a sweep which is quite easy with the GB, just note the displayed frequency if something is felt. Then narrow your sweep to a few Hz below and above the noted frequency and sweep again to home in on the actual frequency felt and to confirm the "hit". It is not a perfect system but better than none at all.

If you sweep around the listed cancer frequencies this should make the search much faster. You will have to builds on your own experience since you are in effect a pioneer whenever you use these devices to treat something this difficult. It is very much a treatment that involves the response of the person being treated. Once you learn the individuals responses and what duration of time produces a response you can use that as a guideline for future reference.

I do not envy the position you are in treating such a serious condition. But I am glad you are so diligent in your research. I just wish there was some real good solid protocol available for you. But cancer has been a tough nut to crack for any treatment. Frequency treatments are no exception.

Best Regards

Dan Bergman

[Hans Gimpelj]

Hi Dan,

Thankyou for your response. I know that this is not an exact science and a lot of time is spent on trying to find the right frequencies, I also appreciate that many other people in similar circunstances have spent a great deal of time looking for the right frequencies, some with success and some without. I supose I am trying to narrow the "waste-time" as I am not sure how much time I have with my Mother to be able to help.

My GB-4000/SR-4 has left the states and is now on its way over here. I expect delivery in a few days. I have quit my job and next Friday I will be moving 300 Klms south to be with her for this treatment, for however long it takes.

In between packing it is great to know that all of you are out there trying to help and this is of great comfort to us.

I have set-up a file on my PC and every detail of the treatment starting from day 1 will be recorded to enable me to share the results with others.

Kind regards

[Byron Robinson]

[reply=Byron Robinson]
I've used 30/45 seconds scans on my wife (who has metastatic breast cancer) and have documented that she noticed a sensation within 20-seconds on most of the frequencies termed 'hits' but, on some frequencies, of longer scan periods (90-seconds), she noticed a sensation after 60 seconds has expired. However, I have also noted that on a pulse frequency of 37Hz the time of initial sensation is much shorter.

Hans,

I think you are under the impression that a person could have run one good effective frequency earlier and feel it later when running a noneffective one. I believe that you will ether feel it at the time it is running or not at all. In another words if 666 is an effective cancer killing frequency and you run it for 30 seconds and nothing is felt then nothing will be felt later either. You may have to run it longer for a sensation to be felt but it will not produce a sensation after the fact. At least I have never heard of that happening or experienced it personally.

If you are doing a sweep which is quite easy with the GB, just note the displayed frequency if something is felt. Then narrow your sweep to a few Hz below and above the noted frequency and sweep again to home in on the actual frequency felt and to confirm the "hit". It is not a perfect system but better than none at all.

If you sweep around the listed cancer frequencies this should make the search much faster. You will have to builds on your own experience since you are in effect a pioneer whenever you use these devices to treat something this difficult. It is very much a treatment that involves the response of the person being treated. Once you learn the individuals responses and what duration of time produces a response you can use that as a guideline for future reference.

I do not envy the position you are in treating such a serious condition. But I am glad you are so diligent in your research. I just wish there was some real good solid protocol available for you. But cancer has been a tough nut to crack for any treatment. Frequency treatments are no exception.

Best Regards

Dan Bergman