Can a Rife machine cure cancer?

[Westley Chang]

I am thinking about purchasing the BG4000 and would like to know whether anyone has used the BG4000 machine during chemotherapy. In another words, my father will be going through chemotherapy and would like to know whether it is wise to use the BG4000 machine in conjunction with chemotherapy? Thanks to all who can provide any recommendations and advice.

Regards,

Wes

[Alexander Potupikoff]

I am thinking about purchasing the BG4000 and would like to know whether anyone has used the BG4000 machine during chemotherapy. In another words, my father will be going through chemotherapy and would like to know whether it is wise to use the BG4000 machine in conjunction with chemotherapy? Thanks to all who can provide any recommendations and advice.

Regards,

Wes

I am opposed to chemotherapy. But life dictates its own terms. Patients themselves make decisions. Now these two. One after chemotherapy - 7 days (cancer of the stomach, liver, portal vein). Other - dessiminirovannaya astrocytoma of the brain, the state after partial resection. In the second case, agreed to chemotherapy, but after the positive dynamics of clinical symptoms. Up to 3 months of chemotherapy Rife frequencies. At frequencies of Rife therapy, chemotherapy, underwent easy. In the first case, the negative effects of chemotherapy were all in 4 days. Stopped vomiting after meals, stomach bleeding, appetite, normolizovalsya chair. For a week the patient recovered on 3kilogramma.

[Westley Chang]

Does anyone know how long the GB4000 M.O.P.A. plasma ray tube last? I am thinking that after a few years the gases in the plasma ray tube would eventually dissipate just like a plasma screen television.

I guess the question is how long does the plasma ray tube last as well as how much it would cost to replace. BTW, is there anyway a person like myself can manually replace the gases or is that too dangerous. Thanks.

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westley,

I have been running 3 of the tubes now for over 2 years for several hours a day and they are still like new. I expect that they will last several years without the need of the gas being replaced. Cost of replacement is around $230.

To replace the gas yourself, without the proper equipment, would be very difficult.

Regards,
Jeff Garff

Does anyone know how long the GB4000 M.O.P.A. plasma ray tube last? I am thinking that after a few years the gases in the plasma ray tube would eventually dissipate just like a plasma screen television.

I guess the question is how long does the plasma ray tube last as well as how much it would cost to replace. BTW, is there anyway a person like myself can manually replace the gases or is that too dangerous. Thanks.

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westley,

I have talked to many people who have used it with chemotherapy. They usually wait 3 or 4 days after their treatment before they start using the machine again.

Has your father considered Hydrazine Sulfate? It works far better that chemotheraphy and you do not get sick using it. Dr. Gold has followed many people who have used it and for those who start using it as soon as they find out they have cancer they have about a 43% recovery rate comparied with only 3% for chemotheraphy. Just something to consider. Information about Hydrazine Sulfate can be found at the link below.

http://www.rifevideos.com/cancer_and...e_sulfate.html

Regards,
Jeff Garff

I am thinking about purchasing the BG4000 and would like to know whether anyone has used the BG4000 machine during chemotherapy. In another words, my father will be going through chemotherapy and would like to know whether it is wise to use the BG4000 machine in conjunction with chemotherapy? Thanks to all who can provide any recommendations and advice.

Regards,

Wes

[Westley Chang]

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick e-mail reply. My brother and I have been desperately telling him not to go the chemo route. However, he is under increasing duress and pressure from his doctors to go this route.

I did hear about hydrazine sulfate. Do you know where is a good place to purchase it? Any recommendations/advice would be enormously appreciated!
Thanks again.

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westley,

Go to the link in the last email and go to the bottom of the page there are three links for places to purchase it.

Regards,
Jeff Garff

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick e-mail reply. My brother and I have been desperately telling him not to go the chemo route. However, he is under increasing duress and pressure from his doctors to go this route.

I did hear about hydrazine sulfate. Do you know where is a good place to purchase it? Any recommendations/advice would be enormously appreciated!
Thanks again.

Regards,

Wes

[Westley Chang]

Its me again. Sorry for asking so many questions.

I am torn between purchasing the GB4000 and the Resonant Light PERL machine.

I was looking at the specs and noticed that the Resonant Light PERL only has a frequency range of 1 million hertz compared to the GB4000 which is 20 million hertz.

Based upon the document from Nenah Sylver, she mentions that it is not so much the frequency range as the harmonics (or sideband frequencies) created by the machine which destroy the cancer. Apparently, I was told that the PERL machine is so finely tuned that it precisely creates the required frequencies with ease. On the other hand, it sounds like the GB4000 is more manual in the sense that one has to search the right specific frequencies which work.

On the other hand, I was reading some cites and it mentions the following,"
When looking to purchase a frequency generator the two most important considerations when purchasing a frequency generator is the FREQUENCY RANGE and POWER OUTPUT of the instrument. If it does not have a frequency range which goes from the audio range to at least 12,000,000 hertz (12 million or 12 Megahertz) then you will not be able to use Dr. Rife’s original high RF frequencies."

Last but not least, there is much more information about the GB4000 than there is about the PERL machine.

Any advice or recommendations would be enormously appreciated. Thanks again.

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westley,

What it comes down to is what you want. The PERL has a fixed carrier frequency of 27MHz and the MOPA has a variable carrier frequency from 2.1MHz to 3.6MHZ.

We made the MOPA variable so that people would have the choice of being able to set the carrier frequency on frequencies that were used by Philip Hoyland and Dr. Rife in the Beam Ray Clinical instrument. By making it a variable carrier you can use three methods. One: Use the frequency they used directly. Two: use sidebands to hit the frequency. If you can hit the frequency by either a direct frequency or a sideband it would be better than hitting it with, Three: a square wave harmonic.

So what it really comes down to is you have to decide which method you would prefer to use. Both instruments are good instruments.

Regards,
Jeff Garff

Its me again. Sorry for asking so many questions.

I am torn between purchasing the GB4000 and the Resonant Light PERL machine.

I was looking at the specs and noticed that the Resonant Light PERL only has a frequency range of 1 million hertz compared to the GB4000 which is 20 million hertz.

Based upon the document from Nenah Sylver, she mentions that it is not so much the frequency range as the harmonics (or sideband frequencies) created by the machine which destroy the cancer. Apparently, I was told that the PERL machine is so finely tuned that it precisely creates the required frequencies with ease. On the other hand, it sounds like the GB4000 is more manual in the sense that one has to search the right specific frequencies which work.

On the other hand, I was reading some cites and it mentions the following,"
When looking to purchase a frequency generator the two most important considerations when purchasing a frequency generator is the FREQUENCY RANGE and POWER OUTPUT of the instrument. If it does not have a frequency range which goes from the audio range to at least 12,000,000 hertz (12 million or 12 Megahertz) then you will not be able to use Dr. Rife’s original high RF frequencies."

Last but not least, there is much more information about the GB4000 than there is about the PERL machine.

Any advice or recommendations would be enormously appreciated. Thanks again.

Regards,

Wes

[Westley Chang]

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply.

I noticed from your message the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set at 27 Mhz versus the GB4000 set at 2.1MHz to 3.6MHZ. I am not clear on why the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set so high versus the GB4000.

If possible, could you possibly explain the differences between a machine with a higher carrier frequency compared to a machine with a lower carrier frequency such as the GB4000?

Is it better to have a higher carrier frequency?

I noticed that the GB4000 has a higher "Frequency Range in Hertz" but not sure what that has to do with carrier frequency.

Any clarification would be enormously appreciated!

Thanks!

Regards,

Wes

[Jeff Garff]

Hello Westly,

My answers will probably cause you to have more questions. You can call and I will do my best to answer all your questions.

Jeff Garff
888-486-4420

Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply.

I noticed from your message the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set at 27 Mhz versus the GB4000 set at 2.1MHz to 3.6MHZ. I am not clear on why the Perl machine's carrier frequency is set so high versus the GB4000.

If possible, could you possibly explain the differences between a machine with a higher carrier frequency compared to a machine with a lower carrier frequency such as the GB4000?

Is it better to have a higher carrier frequency?

I noticed that the GB4000 has a higher "Frequency Range in Hertz" but not sure what that has to do with carrier frequency.

Any clarification would be enormously appreciated!

Thanks!

Regards,

Wes

[Judith Dew]

I used a very simple EMEM with plasma tube and hand-held signal generator. The frequencies were in the very low to low range.
I'm trying to contact the builder, but he's hard to get hold of. He gave me the frequency set - and it had a positive track record.
A protege of his used it for metastasized breast cancer in the lymph nodes and lung. Who would have guessed that 4 years later
I'd be asking the question, "How did it work?" I was living in a different paradigm!

The fact that he used frequencies associated with superstition is dumb-founding. Congratulations on your outcomes. I don't know
in what direction the book I've almost finished will take me. It's been a long, arduous process, and I feel like a completely
different person. Keep up the very excellent work! Judith Dew

[Brenda Jackson]

Judith how are you getting on with your book?

[Alex Kpoxa]

Hi Jeff,

What is your opinion on True Rife machines?
I have found F117 on http://www.truerife.com

It looks like it is more advanced than other machines on the market and very well build. Have you heard any results from people using it?

Thanks,
Alex

[John Kane]

Alex,
If you do a search of this forum, you will find many posts about the TrueRife device.
Just go to the top of any page and enter the search term.
From my research you can do better with other devices.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--POKmWtH78

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PThs4wClkrA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmzkDSYJ4VM